Generador de texto Chomsky

It may be, then, that this selectionally introduced contextual feature
raises serious doubts about irrelevant intervening contexts in
selectional rules.
Let us continue to suppose that any associated supporting element is
unspecified with respect to nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive
feature theory.
However, this assumption is not correct, since most of the
methodological work in modern linguistics suffices to account for a
general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.
In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), a descriptively
adequate grammar is not to be considered in determining the levels of
acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g.
(98d)).
Let us continue to suppose that relational information raises serious
doubts about an important distinction in language use.
Note that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is
not subject to the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the appearance
of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary
extraction raises serious doubts about problems of phonemic and
morphological analysis.
Nevertheless, the notion of level of grammaticalness raises serious
doubts about a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.
This suggests that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition delimits
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.
Nevertheless, any associated supporting element is not subject to an
abstract underlying order.