I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings you grant us permission to store that information on your device.
Alquile su vehículo o motocicleta a un precio muy económico.
Cuando encontramos este algoritmo en una receta de ActiveState supimos que teníamos que emplearlo en nuestros textos de prueba. Total, se entiende igual que el latín y tiene la misma información que un discurso político.
Conversely, the notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of grammarians. It must be emphasized, once again, that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not to be considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. From C1, it follows that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition does not readily tolerate a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. Nevertheless, the descriptive power of the base component raises serious doubts about an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction delimits the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. Thus most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is not subject to the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. On the other hand, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier suffices to account for the strong generative capacity of the theory. Conversely, the descriptive power of the base component appears to correlate rather closely with an important distinction in language use. Thus the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition does not readily tolerate a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. To characterize a linguistic level L, the notion of level of grammaticalness is to be regarded as the strong generative capacity of the theory.