Generador de texto Chomsky

It must be emphasized, once again, that an important property of these
three types of EC is, apparently, determined by a parasitic gap
construction.
Of course, the systematic use of complex symbols does not affect the
structure of a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been
defined by the paired utterance test.
In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), this analysis
of a formative as a pair of sets of features can be defined in such a
way as to impose an important distinction in language use.
In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), a subset of
English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is
unspecified with respect to a parasitic gap construction.
Notice, incidentally, that a descriptively adequate grammar is not
subject to a descriptive fact.
So far, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier may remedy
and, at the same time, eliminate the levels of acceptability from fairly
high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).
Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96)
and (97), we see that most of the methodological work in modern
linguistics is not quite equivalent to a corpus of utterance tokens upon
which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.
Notice, incidentally, that the natural general principle that will
subsume this case cannot be arbitrary in a corpus of utterance tokens
upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.
With this clarification, any associated supporting element cannot be
arbitrary in a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been
defined by the paired utterance test.
On our assumptions, the systematic use of complex symbols is rather
different from a descriptive fact.