I agree Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your device in order to deliver better content and for statistical purposes. You can disable the usage of cookies by changing the settings of your browser. By browsing our website without changing the browser settings you grant us permission to store that information on your device.
Alquile su vehículo o motocicleta a un precio muy económico.
Cuando encontramos este algoritmo en una receta de ActiveState supimos que teníamos que emplearlo en nuestros textos de prueba. Total, se entiende igual que el latín y tiene la misma información que un discurso político.
Nevertheless, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds can be defined in such a way as to impose the traditional practice of grammarians. Conversely, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is, apparently, determined by an abstract underlying order. It may be, then, that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics can be defined in such a way as to impose a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, this selectionally introduced contextual feature suffices to account for the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. Let us continue to suppose that the natural general principle that will subsume this case does not affect the structure of the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: any associated supporting element is not to be considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, relational information does not affect the structure of the traditional practice of grammarians. Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that a descriptively adequate grammar raises serious doubts about a parasitic gap construction. We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the notion of level of grammaticalness does not readily tolerate an important distinction in language use. To characterize a linguistic level L, the notion of level of grammaticalness suffices to account for problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.