Cuando encontramos este algoritmo en una receta de ActiveState supimos que teníamos que emplearlo en nuestros textos de prueba. Total, se entiende igual que el latín y tiene la misma información que un discurso político
I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features cannot be arbitrary in a descriptive fact. On our assumptions, this selectionally introduced contextual feature raises serious doubts about irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. However, this assumption is not correct, since a descriptively adequate grammar is unspecified with respect to the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Notice, incidentally, that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition raises serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Notice, incidentally, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is to be regarded as the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. From C1, it follows that the descriptive power of the base component is to be regarded as the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34). Nevertheless, the systematic use of complex symbols suffices to account for nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, any associated supporting element is not subject to a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. Of course, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics raises serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. On the other hand, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not affect the structure of the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.