Generador de texto Chomsky

I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that
this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features cannot be
arbitrary in a descriptive fact.
On our assumptions, this selectionally introduced contextual feature
raises serious doubts about irrelevant intervening contexts in
selectional rules.
However, this assumption is not correct, since a descriptively adequate
grammar is unspecified with respect to the system of base rules
exclusive of the lexicon.
Notice, incidentally, that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition
raises serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions
into these various categories.
Notice, incidentally, that this analysis of a formative as a pair of
sets of features is to be regarded as the ultimate standard that
determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.
From C1, it follows that the descriptive power of the base component is
to be regarded as the extended c-command discussed in connection with
(34).
Nevertheless, the systematic use of complex symbols suffices to account
for nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible
to movement, any associated supporting element is not subject to a
general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.
Of course, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics raises
serious doubts about a stipulation to place the constructions into these
various categories.
On the other hand, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of
features does not affect the structure of the system of base rules
exclusive of the lexicon.