Generador de texto Chomsky

So far, any associated supporting element may remedy and, at the same
time, eliminate a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.
I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that
this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features delimits the
levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual
gibberish (e.g. (98d)).
Of course, most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is,
apparently, determined by nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive
feature theory.
Furthermore, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features
does not readily tolerate an important distinction in language use.
In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the earlier
discussion of deviance is not to be considered in determining a
parasitic gap construction.
Nevertheless, a descriptively adequate grammar is not to be considered
in determining an important distinction in language use.
So far, a descriptively adequate grammar is, apparently, determined by a
stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
Of course, an important property of these three types of EC is necessary
to impose an interpretation on a stipulation to place the constructions
into these various categories.
To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the theory of syntactic
features developed earlier is not to be considered in determining
nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
To characterize a linguistic level L, this analysis of a formative as a
pair of sets of features does not affect the structure of the strong
generative capacity of the theory.