Generador de texto Chomsky

Note that the natural general principle that will subsume this case is
to be regarded as the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of
any proposed grammar.
So far, any associated supporting element is not subject to an abstract
underlying order.
Clearly, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is not
subject to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.
Clearly, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort appears to
correlate rather closely with the requirement that branching is not
tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol.
With this clarification, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition does
not readily tolerate the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g.
(99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)).
Furthermore, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as
categorial raises serious doubts about an important distinction in
language use.
Nevertheless, a descriptively adequate grammar is to be regarded as a
general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.
A consequence of the approach just outlined is that most of the
methodological work in modern linguistics is not subject to an abstract
underlying order.
Presumably, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort raises
serious doubts about an important distinction in language use.
It appears that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not subject
to the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
scope of a complex symbol.