Generador de texto Chomsky

Conversely, the notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to
impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of grammarians.
It must be emphasized, once again, that this selectionally introduced
contextual feature is not to be considered in determining the
traditional practice of grammarians.
From C1, it follows that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition does
not readily tolerate a general convention regarding the forms of the
grammar.
Nevertheless, the descriptive power of the base component raises serious
doubts about an abstract underlying order.
Furthermore, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction delimits the ultimate standard that
determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.
Thus most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is not
subject to the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the
dominance scope of a complex symbol.
On the other hand, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier
suffices to account for the strong generative capacity of the theory.
Conversely, the descriptive power of the base component appears to
correlate rather closely with an important distinction in language use.
Thus the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition does not readily tolerate
a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories.
To characterize a linguistic level L, the notion of level of
grammaticalness is to be regarded as the strong generative capacity of
the theory.