Cuando encontramos este algoritmo en una receta de ActiveState supimos que teníamos que emplearlo en nuestros textos de prueba. Total, se entiende igual que el latín y tiene la misma información que un discurso político
Let us continue to suppose that this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not to be considered in determining an important distinction in language use. It may be, then, that a descriptively adequate grammar is not subject to a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. To characterize a linguistic level L, relational information is necessary to impose an interpretation on a parasitic gap construction. Let us continue to suppose that a descriptively adequate grammar appears to correlate rather closely with the strong generative capacity of the theory. Thus the systematic use of complex symbols is unspecified with respect to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. Conversely, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial appears to correlate rather closely with a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the descriptive power of the base component is not quite equivalent to the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier delimits the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)). With this clarification, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial raises serious doubts about a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. From C1, it follows that a descriptively adequate grammar is necessary to impose an interpretation on the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).