Generador de texto Chomsky

On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar is not subject to
the levels of acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual
gibberish (e.g. (98d)).
We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: relational
information is not subject to the extended c-command discussed in
connection with (34).
Summarizing, then, we assume that a descriptively adequate grammar is,
apparently, determined by a general convention regarding the forms of
the grammar.
Notice, incidentally, that relational information is not quite
equivalent to the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any
proposed grammar.
If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible
to movement, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition does not affect
the structure of the strong generative capacity of the theory.
A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the theory of
syntactic features developed earlier delimits a descriptive fact.
From C1, it follows that any associated supporting element is rather
different from the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any
proposed grammar.
With this clarification, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is
necessary to impose an interpretation on problems of phonemic and
morphological analysis.
Nevertheless, relational information suffices to account for an abstract
underlying order.
Let us continue to suppose that the earlier discussion of deviance does
not affect the structure of nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive
feature theory.