Generador de texto Chomsky

It must be emphasized, once again, that the natural general principle
that will subsume this case is, apparently, determined by an abstract
underlying order.
It may be, then, that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort
is unspecified with respect to a descriptive fact.
Nevertheless, the notion of level of grammaticalness is rather different
from irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.
Thus the descriptive power of the base component is, apparently,
determined by the strong generative capacity of the theory.
Conversely, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition appears to
correlate rather closely with the strong generative capacity of the
theory.
I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that
relational information does not readily tolerate the ultimate standard
that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar.
By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the descriptive power
of the base component delimits nondistinctness in the sense of
distinctive feature theory.
Note that relational information is not subject to the levels of
acceptability from fairly high (e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g.
(98d)).
If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible
to movement, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as
categorial is not subject to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which
conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.
Notice, incidentally, that a descriptively adequate grammar is necessary
to impose an interpretation on the strong generative capacity of the
theory.